We have been asked frequently how to distinguish an independent contractor from a company employee. Does it matter? From the company's perspective, it matters. The distinction between them is crucial because the company does not need to provide benefits such as health insurance and a retirement savings plan (also known as a 401k plan) for independent contractors, nor does the company need to pay state and federal payroll taxes (include social security, Medicare taxes, and unemployment compensation). Furthermore, independent contractors are much less regulated than regular employees, where the companies need to abide by multiple layers of rules and regulations regarding hiring and firing, vacation policy, etc.
The differences between independent contractors and salary-based employees are also reflected in the stock options of a startup company. An incentive stock option (“ISO”) is a corporate benefit that gives an employee the right to buy shares of company stock with the benefit of possible tax breaks on the profit. The profit on qualified ISOs is usually taxed at the capital gains rate (usually 15%-20%), not the higher rate for ordinary income (usually 37%). ISOs can only be granted to employees.
On the other hand, Non-qualified stock options (“NSOs”) can be granted to any service provider (including both employees and independent contractors). NSOs are stock options that, when exercised, result in ordinary income (tax rate is usually 37%) taxable for the difference between the exercise price and the fair market value of the underlying shares and calculated on the exercise date. Public companies typically grant NSOs, as opposed to private companies, which it is common for them to grant ISOs.
Given that misclassification can create serious legal problems, entrepreneurs should take great care when classifying workers.
So what are the factors to distinguish salary-based employees from independent contractors? What makes someone an independent contractor vs. a salary-based employee?
The IRS has a laundry list of factors to consider. Their evaluation is focused on control, behavior, finances, and the type of relationship the two parties have. Generally, independent contractors retain sufficient control and autonomy with respect to the manner and means of their performance. On the contrary, workers subject to regular supervision and control are more likely to be considered employees. Here are twenty factors used by the IRS as a guide to determine whether the entities paying for services have enough control over the person providing the services.
Independent contractors are responsible for their own business’s profit or loss, while employees are not.
If a worker has an investment in the equipment used to perform the work, he is likely to be an independent contractor. Otherwise, the worker is likely to be an employee.
Independent contractors can work on multiple projects for different firms, while employees can only work for one firm.
An independent contractor offers services to the general public through advertising, while an employee does not.
Independent contractors do not need to follow certain instructions to provide services, while employees need to follow specific instructions about when, where, and how to perform the work.
Employees are usually provided with training, while independent contractors are not because they are already trained.
If a worker’s services are so essential to the business as part of it, he or she is likely to be an employee and is subject to the employer’s control.
If the tasks can be delegated to someone else and do not need to be rendered personally, the worker is likely to be an independent contractor. Otherwise, the worker is an employee.
Same as the analysis above. If a worker hires someone else to perform the work and pays his or her own staff, he or she is likely to be an independent contractor. Otherwise, the worker is an employee.
If services are performed frequently, but not regularly, the relationship can be considered ongoing and once the contract is over and the payment is made, an independent contractor owes no duties to the entity paying the services.
Independent contractors have flexible work hours, but employees need to comply with the working schedule set by the employer.
Generally, independent contractors choose when and where they will work. On the contrary, employees usually do not have a choice.
Independent contractors do not need to work on the premises; employees are subject to control over where the work will be performed.
If the entity paying for the services has the right to determine the order in which services are performed, the worker is likely to be an independent contractor because this shows control over the worker.
Independent contractors do not provide updates until the project is done; However, an employee gives his employer reports accounting for his actions.
Independent contractors get paid according to the agreed-upon terms and conditions of the contract; employees, on the other hand, get paid according to the payroll schedule (weekly, bi-weekly, or monthly).
For independent contractors, expenses are part of the total payment for the services, while expenses are out-of-the-pocket costs for employees and can be reimbursed by the employer.
Independent contractors are not provided with equipment, tools, or materials and usually use their own tools and equipment for the job.
Given that there is a contract signed by the independent contractor and the entity receiving the services, independent contractors can not be fired without causing the risk of breach of contract; at-will employees can be terminated at any time for any reason.
Same as the analysis above. An independent contractor has a legal obligation to complete the contract pursuant to the terms and conditions of the contract; at-will employees can quit at any time for any reason as long as advance notices are given to the employer properly.
The state of California has a famous "ABC" test, which focuses on whether the worker is free of the control of the hiring entity, whether the worker performs work outside of the hiring entity's usual business, and whether the worker has an independent business that's consistent with the work they are doing for the hiring entity. A worker is considered an employee and not an independent contractor unless the hiring entity meets all three conditions of the ABC test:
In addition, a worker’s status can affect the employer's rights to any copyrightable works or patentable inventions created by the worker. We will write a separate article about this topic and discuss these issues thoroughly (stay tuned!)
In a nutshell, the employer generally is deemed to be the author of any work created by an employee acting within the scope of employment. Similarly, the employer is the owner of any invention created by an employee. In contrast, a company commissioning work by an independent contractor will not own the copyright unless the company secures either a written contract stating that it is “a work made for hire” or a written assignment of the copyright.
There are lots of good resources, diagrams, and checklists about this topic.
*The information provided on this website does not, and is not intended to, constitute legal advice; instead, all information, content, and materials available on this site are for general informational purposes only.
Gloria is the founder of Sleegal.ai, seasoned lawyer, business person and entrepreneur, determined to bring legal help to you at an affordable cost efficiently.
Gloria is the founder of Sleegal.ai, seasoned lawyer, business person and entrepreneur, determined to bring legal help to you at an affordable cost efficiently.
Drop us a note. We will get back to you within 1 business day.
Back in the day, ERP implementations used to be a nightmare for many companies. We've all heard of horror stories where millions of dollars were spent on planning and implementation, only to be told that the whole thing was a failure. But why is this still happening? With our extensive experience in ERP, we have identified the four main challenges that companies face when selecting and implementing an ERP solution. We are working to create a new generation of ERP systems that are easy to implement, intuitive to use, and adaptable to each organization's unique needs. Stay tuned for our new product roadmap!
Read moreA long time ago, we’ve written about the best and worst use of AI when it comes to lawyers. If some of you recall, our original “Sleegal AI” is a ChatGPT style chatbot to help people find lawyers. Before we know it, AI Generated Content (“AIGC”) has become the hottest topic in 2023. With this in mind and deriving from our understanding of AI, legal tech and self-driving cars, what is ChatGPT good and bad at?
Read moreWhen we talk to our potential customers in the field, especially the relatively new startups who are going through hypergrowth, we notice that there is a lot of misunderstanding and confusion about needing a procurement team at all. We have seen hyper-growth companies with a few thousand employees, some of which may even produce and sell hardware, who don’t have a procurement function at all. This is mind-boggling and very dangerous. Here are the common fallacies about whether and why a company needs procurement and our responses to them.
Read moreIn the past we have written extensively about why metrics matter for procurement leaders and why having a system to keep track of them is of essential importance. Today, I’d like to discuss one metric that procurement managers often overlook. Even in cases when they do realize the importance of this metric, it’s one of the metrics that’s more opaque and harder to keep track of. However, this metric is extremely important to keep track of. Keeping this metric under control and strict scrutiny will go a long way to not only cut cost, but increase bottom line. Here is why and how.
Read moreWe have written extensively about why there should be a “Chief Procurement Officer” position and why such leaders should have a seat at the C-suite table, rather than reporting to the CFO or an engineering officer. But how? Like most things in this life, it won’t get handed on a silver platter. I have many fellow procurement leaders who are struggling to receive acknowledgment and achieve a voice. Here are some suggestions.
Read moreUser experience designers tend to overthink and complicate things when it comes to product design. Our UX Design team collaborated to provide their top suggestions for enhancing efficiency and improving the user experience by avoiding these common missteps.
Read more